Sunday, November 16, 2014

Hamlet ( The Madman?)

Hamlet often comes across as an insane, delusional teenager who can’t seem to make up his mind. People call him crazy, indecisive, and some will go so far as to say Hamlet is a madman, but how can you call mad a man who faces such extensive trauma so early in his life and still manages to follow through with such well thought out scheme for revenge? Hamlet is clearly far from crazy and should be interpreted as a genius struggling after the death of his father and the swift remarriage of his mother.
It is obvious that many of the characters in the play think that Hamlet is crazy, and for good reason. Hamlet has been putting on a show for the majority of them ever since he learned the truth of Claudius and his father. Beginning in the second act of the play, Hamlet begins his plot to lower the defenses of King Claudius and Gertrude by pretending to be insane. After first going through these first few scenes, some may come to the conclusion that Hamlet isn't acting, and may very well be insane. Upon further insight, however, you can see that Hamlet is just using these interactions with Polonius and others to deceive the King. We can make this deduction when Polonius exits the scene, leaving Hamlet alone with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Hamlet immediately turns back into the witty prince he is, recognizing them both and having quick conversation. Not only is he able to have normal conversation, but he is able to see through Rosencrantz’s lie that they weren't sent by the king. Hamlet’s ability to trick Polonius and others is nothing but brilliance on his part.
It’s argued that Hamlet is delusional, because, after killing Polonius, Hamlet is confronted by the ghost, whom Hamlet can see, but Gertrude cannot. Shakespeare’s decision to make the ghost only visible to Hamlet could mean a number of things, but it definitely wasn't meant to portray Hamlet as mentally ill. First of all, Hamlet is not the only person in the play to have seen the ghost. In fact, a number of characters have witnessed the ghost first hand: Francisco and Bernardo to name a few. By this logic, not only is Hamlet mentally ill, but the entire castle guard is mentally ill as well, including the scholar, Horatio. This argument that Hamlet’s ability to see the ghost represents his insanity is outrageous, as there is no reason for Shakespeare to make this decision in his writing. Another theory, one with slightly more weight, perhaps, is that Hamlet is able to see and interact with the ghost because he has morals. He is able to see both good, represented by the ghost, and evil, represented by Gertrude. With this knowledge, Hamlet is able to make his decisions. Gertrude, however, has lost her morals (assuming she had some to lose.)
Hamlet may seem to be indecisive for a good majority of the play, but is it really indecisiveness that keeps him from exacting his revenge? When Hamlet sees Claudius praying, he has a clear chance to finish him, though he chooses not to. At this point, Hamlet is not being indecisive. He’s actually doing just the opposite. From the moment he confronts the ghost for the first time, Hamlet makes his decision. His decision, however, isn't just to slay Claudius. His decision is to exact revenge in the best manner he can come up with. In this sense, striking down Claudius and presumably sending him to heaven isn't enough. Hamlet needs to be sure that Claudius spends his eternity suffering in the depths of hell. He chooses not to strike down Claudius while he is praying lest Claudius is forgiven for his sins and gains the luxury of eternity in the afterlife. It becomes obvious to us that Hamlet intends to finish the job when he stabs Polonius in the curtain. Hamlet doesn't hesitate once he believes he has his chance to kill Claudius. By this point in the play, there’s no questioning that Hamlet has made his decision.

Though commonly referred to as a madman, Hamlet’s genius and wit is exemplified throughout the course of this play. Though it’s not always clear to the audience, Hamlet is a brilliant young prince that cleverly and patiently goes about avenging his murdered father and getting his own revenge against that man that killed him.

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Notes from reading/in class conversations

-The story of Hamlet is sometimes described as the play about a man who cannot make up his mind
- according to deBoer, Hamletis a play about a man who could not make real what was found in his mind
- for much of the play Hamlet is able to speak but not do
- when instructing the players on how to act, Hamlet is insistent that they do not overact. He wants the passion to be smooth and sound unscripted. 
- this exemplifies the use of self performance to create a social context which supports a visage of sincerity. 
- to over do a self performance would be to undercut the socially excepted notion of a sincere emotional state, taking away your power to create a performative utterancethat relies on a context of emotional appropriateness 
- as Hamlet is instructing the players to not overact he needs to be mindful to not overact himself, as he is putting on a show of madness. According to Hamlet, madness is defined by the kind of exaggerated actions in movements associated with poor acting or overacting
- Hamlet suggests that the goal of the theater has been to "hold up a mirror to nature"
- perlocutinary= relating to an act performed by a speaker unto a listener by act of speaking
- words have the effect of force and action. 
- Hamlet is creating a reality.
- in his soliloquies, Hamlet progresses into thinking that he is not a good guy, and realizes his sins. 
- what enables him to evolve from a man seemingly incapable of giving his stated aims physical expression.